20 Loaves and A Forgotten Mutiny

HMIS Hindustan

In March, 1976 P.V.Chakraborty,  former Chief Justice of Kolkata HC  wrote a letter, where he described a correspondence between him and the British Prime Minister Clement Atlee in 1956. Atlee often mocked by Churchill as a “Modest man, with much to be modest about”, was visiting India in 1956, after it became independent. And during his visit, met Chakraborty, who was then acting Governor of West Bengal, and was asked  “The Quit India Movement of Gandhi practically died out long before 1947 and there was nothing in the Indian situation at that time, which made it necessary for the British to leave India in a hurry. Why then did they do so?”. Atlee gave out several reasons, one was Netaji Subash Chandra Bose’s Indian National Army, which weakened their army, and the other was the Royal Indian Navy Mutiny. And when Chakraborty asked him about impact of Gandhiji’s 1942 Quit India movement, Atlee wryly remarked with a smile “Minimal”.
I had mentioned this earlier in my article on Netaji about impact of INA, and am quoting an excerpt from that article.

But it  could not prevent mutinies from breaking out in the British  Army ,  especially the one by the Indian soldiers of the Royal Navy.  Chennai,  Pune, Jabalpur all saw the Indian soldiers rising in mutiny.  The  British often used the Indian soldiers as cannon fodder, they did  all  the dirty work, were the persons on front line in conflict and in  many  World Wars, many Indian soldiers died fighting for the British  empire.  Yet in grant for this, the British, treated the Indian soldiers  as  second class citizens, and exploited them. It was Bose’s Indian   National Army which sparked the uprising. Years later Clement Atlee ,   cited the revolts of the Indian Army, as a major decision, to grant   independence. Britain already economically and militarily weakened,   after WW2, knew that it could no longer trust the Indian armed forces  to  prop up it’s Raj. So in a way, Bose, contributed significantly to  the  end of the Raj.

Royal Naval Ratings Mutiny, or what is often called the forgotten mutiny in India’s history, an event which unlike the 1857 mutiny or the Quit India movement, does not really strike much resonance, except among hard core historians. Or Leftists, since they were the only ones to have backed this whole heartedly.
The Beginning.
Like the 1857 Mutiny, the 1946 Royal Naval ratings mutiny had a rather mundane beginning.  It was not an overnight event however, the resentment was building up among the naval ratings, and other Indian members of the Army. The INA was the most serious of all that really shook the faith of the British. Not that well known is something called the Royal Air Force Mutiny that also took place in 1946, over the working conditions, and demobilization of British troops after the end of the war.

The Naval Ratings

The beginnings of the Naval Ratings Mutiny were in an event that occurred on Jan 16, 1946 when a contingent of Naval ratings arrived at the Castle Barracks in Mint Road of Mumbai’s Fort Area.  This contingent was from the training ship HMIS Akbar, that was at Thane, and it was around evening 4 PM. On being informed of the arrival of the contingent, the galley cook, took out 20 loaves of bread, casually added some water to the mutton curry as well as the dal, that was from the previous day and served it.   The food was so tasteless and substandard that only 17 of the ratings took it, the rest of them went ashore.
This was not a one off incident, such neglect was quite common, and what was even worse, repeated complaints to senior officers of the working conditions, did not elicit any response.  As the complaints became galore, the ratings were more and more frustrated, both with the conditions as well with the indifference of the higher ups. Adding fuel to the fire was the trial of the INA leaders,  Netaji Subash Chandra Bose fight for freedom and the exploits of INA during Siege of Imphal began to be fed to the ratings. It gave them a sort of inspiration, and hope that the mighty British empire was not that invincible.

HMIS Kumaon

The Events
On Feb 18, 1946, Naval Rating M.S.Khan led the revolt on HMS Talwar, and a strike committee was formed.  In Karachi, ratings began the revolt on HMIS Hindustan, anchored off the Manora Island. M.S.Khan and another naval rating Madan Singh, had by now taken control of the mutiny, and it began to spread. By Feb 19,  ratings from Castle and Fort Barracks had joined  the revolt.  Ratings left their posts, and began to go around in Bombay on trucks carrying pictures of Netaji Subash Chandra Bose, who by now had become their inspiration.

rinm3 rin
And soon it spread, to Kochi, Vizag, Kolkata, officers who opposed the strike were thrown off ships, and the mutineers used radio sets to communicate among themselves. HMIS Talwar became the epicenter for the mutiny as the strikers used the radio sets to send messages to and fro between themselves. It was a perfectly co-ordinated revolt, that was now striking back. And soon the other workers in the Navy too joined,  from the sloops, the minesweepers and the offshore establishments in Mumbai, along Hornby Road, near CST, now the Dadabhai Naoroji Road.  The White Ensign of the British was lowered from all the ships, and British officers were singled out for attack by mutineers, using hockey sticks, crowbars and whatever else they could lay their hands on.

Flora Fountain soon reverberated with cries of Jai Hind,  and slogans of liberation. British officers and their wives were forced to shout Jai Hind by the protestors. The Taj Mahal Hotel, Yatch club all had guns trained on them throughout the day. The Royal Indian Air Force joined in solidarity with the striking ratings, and 1000 men from Andheri, Marine Drive camps came in. The Gurkhas in Karachi,  one of the sword arms of the British army, refused to fire on the mutineers.  The mutiny now began to spread like wildfire, Kolkata, Vizag, Chennai, Karachi, reverberated with slogans of “Strike for Bombay”, “Release 11,000 INA prisoners” and “Jai Hind“.

The tricolor was now flying on all the ships, and by Feb 20, British destroyers positioned themselves near the Gateway of India. The British Govt, now headed by Clement Atleee, was alarmed, orders were given to the Royal Navy to put down the revolt.  Admiral J.H.Godfrey, the Flag Officer in command of the Royal Indian Navy, gave an ultimatum to the mutineers to submit or perish. On the other side, a wave of patriotic fervor,surged ahead in support of the mutineers.  The mutineers had taken control of all the ships and were prepared for a last ditch stand from the clerks to the cleaning hands to cooks and wireless operators, every single Indian was ready for the battle.

On Day 3, the Royal Air Force flew a squadron of bombers near Mumbai harbor, while Admiral Arthur Rullion, issued an ultimatum, asking the mutineers to surrender unconditionally. In the meantime, the 2nd Battalion of the Black Watch, silently managed to secure the island of Manora near Karachi.

Soon the decision was made to engage HMIS Hindustan in a straight confrontation,  which was now under the control of the mutineers. The ultimatum was given by the Royal Artillery on Manora island,  to either surrender or be prepared for war. At 10:33 AM, the guns began to fire on HMIS Hindustan,  and the naval ratings returned the fire. However they could not hold on for long, and by 10:51 they surrendered and HMIS Hindustan was taken over by the British. Soon HMIS Bahadur and Himalaya were subdued, and taken over by the British,  and the revolt at Karachi was put down.

With increasing bombardment and not much hope in winning a long drawn war, the mutineers began to surrender, and on Day 4, negotiations took place, where most of the strikers demands were conceded in principle. Immediate steps were taken to improve the quality of the food, and living conditions, and assurance was given, that release of INA prisoners would be considered favorably. 7 RIN sailors and 1 officer was killed, while around 34 were injured and 476 discharged from duty.

The Betrayal.

Sadly the mutineers got no support at all from the Indian National Congress as usual, in fact they were even condemned for their actions.  Mahatma Gandhi issued a statement condemning the mutineers for revolting without any guidance from a political party. One of the lone voices in the Congress who supported the mutineers was Aruna Asaf Ali, who said she would rather unite Hindus and Muslims on the barricades. The Muslim League too denounced the mutineers, arguing that unrest on the streets was not the best way to deal with grievances and it should be through constitutional methods only.  One reason could be that spontaneous uprisings like these threatened the centralized political authority of both Congress and Muslim League, and affected the dealings with the British Govt. One more reason was that neither Congress nor Muslim League was genuinely a mass based party, they still remained a preserve of the upper class, upper caste, elite, and these kind of mass upsurges left them uncomfortable.

The only political party that supported the mutineers was the Communist Party of India then, all others just left them in the lurch. Both Sardar Patel and Md.Ali Jinnah were united in their condemnation of the mutineers actions, and Aruna Asaf Ali was the lone voice from Congress in support of them.  The mutineers faced court martial and imprisonment on surrender, and what was worse even after independence, they received no support from either the Govts of India or Pakistan.

The Royal Naval Ratings Mutiny lasted only for 4 days and was put down swiftly, however the impact went much beyond. The British were now fully convinced, that they could no longer trust the Armed forces to maintain their control over India. So far the British managed to hold on to India, through the Armed forces, but when they began to revolt, they knew their time was up. First the INA revolts and then the Naval Ratings mutiny, add to it the revolts in the Air Force too, plus the fact that Britian was effectively pauperized after World War II,  all influenced their decision to quit India, much more than that 1942 movement.

 

 

Advertisements

About Ratnakar Sadasyula

I am a 40 year old Blogger with a passion in movies, music,books, Quizzing and politics. A techie by profession, and a writer at heart. Seeking to write my own book one day.
This entry was posted in Indian Freedom Struggle, Modern India. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to 20 Loaves and A Forgotten Mutiny

  1. Shailender says:

    Amazing article…i will follow this website to know my country’s true history!

  2. Pingback: Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon | History Under Your Feet

  3. D. V.Bhat says:

    Thank you for bringing out the yruth about the Navy’s mutiny against British Raj in 1946. None of the history book mention about this event. Congress, it is clear, even during those period was not a mass nased but of only elite. Much is now being made out by these Congis. The article brings out the hypocrisy of Congress out.

  4. Priti Rajandekar says:

    Thanks for bringing out truth. One step we have to do is to chang history book of schools and colleges. So that our children come to know about truth.

  5. Pingback: Which incidents have been conveniently forgotten by history? – Quora

  6. Bhoop Bishnoi says:

    This probably explains why Nehru wanted to disband the armed forces of India soon after independence. The fear or distrust of defence forces has remained a vital consideration for our elite political class in the centre, while dealing with armed forces. The graduated attempt to downgrading the status of armed forces (from 3 to 17 in protocol), curtailing legitimate pay and pensions, indifference and adverse political response to the year-long agitation at Jantar Mantar, is a continuing manifestation of the same phobia. Insecure and afraid of its own people.
    Pollitical parties in India never had mass support. They come to power winning around 30% of votes, while 70% had shunned them.
    What was true of the British apprehensions is equally true of their Indian counterparts.

  7. satyase says:

    Didn’t knew about this and thanks much for bringing it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s